Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Regulation 31A(11) permits the stakeholders' consultation committee, by the prescribed majority, to propose replacement of a liquidator, and the Adjudicating Authority may assess whether continuation is conducive to liquidation; the liquidator has no proprietary right in office and is not a person aggrieved merely because of removal, so the challenge was not maintainable. On related party status, the Tribunal held that pledged shares not invoked, lender monitoring, observer appointment, escrow oversight, restructuring supervision, and advisory engagement did not by themselves amount to management or policy control under Section 5(24) of the IBC. EARCL was therefore not treated as a related party, and its voting participation was upheld.
Regulation 31A(11) permits the stakeholders' consultation committee, by the prescribed majority, to propose replacement of a liquidator, and the Adjudicating Authority may assess whether continuation is conducive to liquidation; the liquidator has no proprietary right in office and is not a person aggrieved merely because of removal, so the challenge was not maintainable. On related party status, the Tribunal held that pledged shares not invoked, lender monitoring, observer appointment, escrow oversight, restructuring supervision, and advisory engagement did not by themselves amount to management or policy control under Section 5(24) of the IBC. EARCL was therefore not treated as a related party, and its voting participation was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
