Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Regulation 31A(11) permits the stakeholders' consultation committee, by the prescribed majority, to propose replacement of a liquidator, and the Adjudicating Authority may assess whether continuation is conducive to liquidation; the liquidator has no proprietary right in office and is not a person aggrieved merely because of removal, so the challenge was not maintainable. On related party status, the Tribunal held that pledged shares not invoked, lender monitoring, observer appointment, escrow oversight, restructuring supervision, and advisory engagement did not by themselves amount to management or policy control under Section 5(24) of the IBC. EARCL was therefore not treated as a related party, and its voting participation was upheld.
Regulation 31A(11) permits the stakeholders' consultation committee, by the prescribed majority, to propose replacement of a liquidator, and the Adjudicating Authority may assess whether continuation is conducive to liquidation; the liquidator has no proprietary right in office and is not a person aggrieved merely because of removal, so the challenge was not maintainable. On related party status, the Tribunal held that pledged shares not invoked, lender monitoring, observer appointment, escrow oversight, restructuring supervision, and advisory engagement did not by themselves amount to management or policy control under Section 5(24) of the IBC. EARCL was therefore not treated as a related party, and its voting participation was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
