Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CENVAT credit distributed through ISD invoices remained subject to merits review, so the recipient unit could be proceeded against and was not immune merely because the credit originated from an ISD. On outward transportation, admissibility depended on the place of removal: where contractual terms showed that delivery, installation, commissioning and acceptance at the buyer's premises completed the sale, that premises was treated as the place of removal and transportation up to that point was eligible in principle. The extended period was unavailable because the dispute was interpretational, statutory records were filed, and no wilful suppression or intent to evade was shown. The demand, interest and penalty were therefore time-barred and unsustainable.
CENVAT credit distributed through ISD invoices remained subject to merits review, so the recipient unit could be proceeded against and was not immune merely because the credit originated from an ISD. On outward transportation, admissibility depended on the place of removal: where contractual terms showed that delivery, installation, commissioning and acceptance at the buyer's premises completed the sale, that premises was treated as the place of removal and transportation up to that point was eligible in principle. The extended period was unavailable because the dispute was interpretational, statutory records were filed, and no wilful suppression or intent to evade was shown. The demand, interest and penalty were therefore time-barred and unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.