Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
A false allegation of breach of natural justice was rejected after the original record showed that the petitioner had in fact been personally heard by the appellate authority and had signed the proceedings. The discrepancy in the date recorded in the impugned order was treated as a clerical error, because the portal and the original order reflected the correct position. In view of the false statement made before the Court, the writ petition was not entertained and exemplary costs were imposed.
A false allegation of breach of natural justice was rejected after the original record showed that the petitioner had in fact been personally heard by the appellate authority and had signed the proceedings. The discrepancy in the date recorded in the impugned order was treated as a clerical error, because the portal and the original order reflected the correct position. In view of the false statement made before the Court, the writ petition was not entertained and exemplary costs were imposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
