Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
A false allegation of breach of natural justice was rejected after the original record showed that the petitioner had in fact been personally heard by the appellate authority and had signed the proceedings. The discrepancy in the date recorded in the impugned order was treated as a clerical error, because the portal and the original order reflected the correct position. In view of the false statement made before the Court, the writ petition was not entertained and exemplary costs were imposed.
A false allegation of breach of natural justice was rejected after the original record showed that the petitioner had in fact been personally heard by the appellate authority and had signed the proceedings. The discrepancy in the date recorded in the impugned order was treated as a clerical error, because the portal and the original order reflected the correct position. In view of the false statement made before the Court, the writ petition was not entertained and exemplary costs were imposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
