Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dividend remittance to foreign shareholders was permitted despite pending tax demands because those demands were already under challenge and stayed, and the Court found that an indefinite embargo on repatriation was unjustified. Revenue protection was maintained by requiring the company to furnish an auto-renewable interest-bearing FDR of equivalent value, comply with remittance rules, and deduct tax at source; the earlier lien on existing FDRs was lifted. Separately, refund for AY 2021-22 was allowed to be adjusted against the demand for AY 2018-19 on the petitioner's concession, and the Department was protected from any contempt allegation if the refund was adjusted against outstanding demand for AY 2020-21.
Dividend remittance to foreign shareholders was permitted despite pending tax demands because those demands were already under challenge and stayed, and the Court found that an indefinite embargo on repatriation was unjustified. Revenue protection was maintained by requiring the company to furnish an auto-renewable interest-bearing FDR of equivalent value, comply with remittance rules, and deduct tax at source; the earlier lien on existing FDRs was lifted. Separately, refund for AY 2021-22 was allowed to be adjusted against the demand for AY 2018-19 on the petitioner's concession, and the Department was protected from any contempt allegation if the refund was adjusted against outstanding demand for AY 2020-21.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.