Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Dividend remittance to foreign shareholders was permitted despite pending tax demands because those demands were already under challenge and stayed, and the Court found that an indefinite embargo on repatriation was unjustified. Revenue protection was maintained by requiring the company to furnish an auto-renewable interest-bearing FDR of equivalent value, comply with remittance rules, and deduct tax at source; the earlier lien on existing FDRs was lifted. Separately, refund for AY 2021-22 was allowed to be adjusted against the demand for AY 2018-19 on the petitioner's concession, and the Department was protected from any contempt allegation if the refund was adjusted against outstanding demand for AY 2020-21.
Dividend remittance to foreign shareholders was permitted despite pending tax demands because those demands were already under challenge and stayed, and the Court found that an indefinite embargo on repatriation was unjustified. Revenue protection was maintained by requiring the company to furnish an auto-renewable interest-bearing FDR of equivalent value, comply with remittance rules, and deduct tax at source; the earlier lien on existing FDRs was lifted. Separately, refund for AY 2021-22 was allowed to be adjusted against the demand for AY 2018-19 on the petitioner's concession, and the Department was protected from any contempt allegation if the refund was adjusted against outstanding demand for AY 2020-21.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
