Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Dividend remittance to foreign shareholders was permitted despite pending tax demands because those demands were already under challenge and stayed, and the Court found that an indefinite embargo on repatriation was unjustified. Revenue protection was maintained by requiring the company to furnish an auto-renewable interest-bearing FDR of equivalent value, comply with remittance rules, and deduct tax at source; the earlier lien on existing FDRs was lifted. Separately, refund for AY 2021-22 was allowed to be adjusted against the demand for AY 2018-19 on the petitioner's concession, and the Department was protected from any contempt allegation if the refund was adjusted against outstanding demand for AY 2020-21.
Dividend remittance to foreign shareholders was permitted despite pending tax demands because those demands were already under challenge and stayed, and the Court found that an indefinite embargo on repatriation was unjustified. Revenue protection was maintained by requiring the company to furnish an auto-renewable interest-bearing FDR of equivalent value, comply with remittance rules, and deduct tax at source; the earlier lien on existing FDRs was lifted. Separately, refund for AY 2021-22 was allowed to be adjusted against the demand for AY 2018-19 on the petitioner's concession, and the Department was protected from any contempt allegation if the refund was adjusted against outstanding demand for AY 2020-21.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
