Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Official certificates and revenue records admitted by the first appellate authority were treated as properly relied upon because they went to the root of the dispute and no specific prejudice to the Revenue was shown. On the merits, the land was accepted as rural agricultural land on the basis of urban development authority certificates, revenue records and census data showing it lay beyond the prescribed municipal distance. As the Assessing Officer produced no independent verification or conclusive contrary evidence, the lands were held to fall outside section 2(14) and outside section 194-IA, so the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) was not sustainable.
Official certificates and revenue records admitted by the first appellate authority were treated as properly relied upon because they went to the root of the dispute and no specific prejudice to the Revenue was shown. On the merits, the land was accepted as rural agricultural land on the basis of urban development authority certificates, revenue records and census data showing it lay beyond the prescribed municipal distance. As the Assessing Officer produced no independent verification or conclusive contrary evidence, the lands were held to fall outside section 2(14) and outside section 194-IA, so the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) was not sustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.