Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Official certificates and revenue records admitted by the first appellate authority were treated as properly relied upon because they went to the root of the dispute and no specific prejudice to the Revenue was shown. On the merits, the land was accepted as rural agricultural land on the basis of urban development authority certificates, revenue records and census data showing it lay beyond the prescribed municipal distance. As the Assessing Officer produced no independent verification or conclusive contrary evidence, the lands were held to fall outside section 2(14) and outside section 194-IA, so the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) was not sustainable.
Official certificates and revenue records admitted by the first appellate authority were treated as properly relied upon because they went to the root of the dispute and no specific prejudice to the Revenue was shown. On the merits, the land was accepted as rural agricultural land on the basis of urban development authority certificates, revenue records and census data showing it lay beyond the prescribed municipal distance. As the Assessing Officer produced no independent verification or conclusive contrary evidence, the lands were held to fall outside section 2(14) and outside section 194-IA, so the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) was not sustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.