Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An estate is assessable under section 168 on income accruing from a deceased person's assets after death, and TDS credit on dividend income belongs to the estate only if the income relates wholly to the post-death period. The ITAT found the legal position undisputed but the record insufficient to decide the relevant period, so the Assessing Officer was directed to verify that fact and grant TDS credit accordingly if the income was post-death. It also held that the Addl./Joint CIT(A) had no power to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer under section 251 in the circumstances, and disapproved that course.
An estate is assessable under section 168 on income accruing from a deceased person's assets after death, and TDS credit on dividend income belongs to the estate only if the income relates wholly to the post-death period. The ITAT found the legal position undisputed but the record insufficient to decide the relevant period, so the Assessing Officer was directed to verify that fact and grant TDS credit accordingly if the income was post-death. It also held that the Addl./Joint CIT(A) had no power to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer under section 251 in the circumstances, and disapproved that course.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.