Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Conversion of drawback shipping bills into EPCG-authorised shipping bills could not be ed solely because the consignments were not physically examined under the EPCG protocol at export. The Tribunal held that the applicable circulars permitted conversion between export promotion schemes, and the Revenue did not show non-compliance with those conditions. It further found that the absence of examination resulted from RMS selection, not any fault of the exporter, and that the Commissioner had failed to consider contemporaneous evidence, including third-party exporter endorsement and no-objection. A procedural lapse not attributable to the exporter was not fatal to a bona fide amendment claim, so the rejection was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Conversion of drawback shipping bills into EPCG-authorised shipping bills could not be ed solely because the consignments were not physically examined under the EPCG protocol at export. The Tribunal held that the applicable circulars permitted conversion between export promotion schemes, and the Revenue did not show non-compliance with those conditions. It further found that the absence of examination resulted from RMS selection, not any fault of the exporter, and that the Commissioner had failed to consider contemporaneous evidence, including third-party exporter endorsement and no-objection. A procedural lapse not attributable to the exporter was not fatal to a bona fide amendment claim, so the rejection was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.