Deductibility for charitable donations affirmed where payments to approved relief funds, even if CSR-driven, qualify under the donation deduction sche...
Mis-declaration in import descriptions must be deliberate to justify confiscation; withheld contemporaneous import documents invalidate value redeterm...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer con...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5361 to 5380 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Amendment of shipping bills under Section 149 was held permissible for conversion of the export promotion scheme code from Drawback code 19 to Drawback and RoSCTL code 60, where the let export orders had been granted before the later 2022 Regulations and no adverse material existed against the shipping bills. The Tribunal treated the incorrect scheme code as an inadvertent procedural error, noted that the goods were eligible for RoSCTL, and rejected the objection that conversion would involve a stricter examination or possible MEIS overlap. It further held that the statutory power to amend documents cannot be curtailed by circulars and that a substantive export incentive otherwise admissible cannot be denied on such procedural grounds. The rejection was set aside.
Amendment of shipping bills under Section 149 was held permissible for conversion of the export promotion scheme code from Drawback code 19 to Drawback and RoSCTL code 60, where the let export orders had been granted before the later 2022 Regulations and no adverse material existed against the shipping bills. The Tribunal treated the incorrect scheme code as an inadvertent procedural error, noted that the goods were eligible for RoSCTL, and rejected the objection that conversion would involve a stricter examination or possible MEIS overlap. It further held that the statutory power to amend documents cannot be curtailed by circulars and that a substantive export incentive otherwise admissible cannot be denied on such procedural grounds. The rejection was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
