Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Exemption from Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 45/2005-Customs was held unavailable where imported bulk tablets were moved from an FTWZ to the importer's factory by stock transfer, because sale on payment of Sales Tax/VAT was a condition precedent and was not satisfied at the clearance stage. However, the demand was set aside as time-barred: the Tribunal found that the record disclosed the nature of the activity and the parties' understanding of the notification, so non-payment of duty could not be treated as suppression, wilful misstatement or similar conduct to justify the extended limitation period under Section 28. The appeals were allowed solely on limitation.
Exemption from Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 45/2005-Customs was held unavailable where imported bulk tablets were moved from an FTWZ to the importer's factory by stock transfer, because sale on payment of Sales Tax/VAT was a condition precedent and was not satisfied at the clearance stage. However, the demand was set aside as time-barred: the Tribunal found that the record disclosed the nature of the activity and the parties' understanding of the notification, so non-payment of duty could not be treated as suppression, wilful misstatement or similar conduct to justify the extended limitation period under Section 28. The appeals were allowed solely on limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
