Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for dir...
Classification of imported goods as electronic cigarette versus tobacco product reversed for lack of proof; order set aside for jurisdictional overrea...
Provisional attachment under the 2002 Act can extend to persons not named as accused in the FIR or chargesheet if the property is linked to proceeds of crime and the person is shown as a recipient or holder of such proceeds. The Tribunal rejected the challenge based solely on non-inclusion in the predicate offence. It also held that the appellants failed to prove the lawful source of more than Rs. 10 crore remitted through banking channels and used for property purchases, and that contemporaneous SMS and purchase records supported the money-trail. The plea that some properties were acquired before the murder did not defeat equivalent value attachment, and the attachment was upheld.
Provisional attachment under the 2002 Act can extend to persons not named as accused in the FIR or chargesheet if the property is linked to proceeds of crime and the person is shown as a recipient or holder of such proceeds. The Tribunal rejected the challenge based solely on non-inclusion in the predicate offence. It also held that the appellants failed to prove the lawful source of more than Rs. 10 crore remitted through banking channels and used for property purchases, and that contemporaneous SMS and purchase records supported the money-trail. The plea that some properties were acquired before the murder did not defeat equivalent value attachment, and the attachment was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
