Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Provisional attachment under the 2002 Act can extend to persons not named as accused in the FIR or chargesheet if the property is linked to proceeds of crime and the person is shown as a recipient or holder of such proceeds. The Tribunal rejected the challenge based solely on non-inclusion in the predicate offence. It also held that the appellants failed to prove the lawful source of more than Rs. 10 crore remitted through banking channels and used for property purchases, and that contemporaneous SMS and purchase records supported the money-trail. The plea that some properties were acquired before the murder did not defeat equivalent value attachment, and the attachment was upheld.
Provisional attachment under the 2002 Act can extend to persons not named as accused in the FIR or chargesheet if the property is linked to proceeds of crime and the person is shown as a recipient or holder of such proceeds. The Tribunal rejected the challenge based solely on non-inclusion in the predicate offence. It also held that the appellants failed to prove the lawful source of more than Rs. 10 crore remitted through banking channels and used for property purchases, and that contemporaneous SMS and purchase records supported the money-trail. The plea that some properties were acquired before the murder did not defeat equivalent value attachment, and the attachment was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
