Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provisional attachment under the 2002 Act can extend to persons not named as accused in the FIR or chargesheet if the property is linked to proceeds of crime and the person is shown as a recipient or holder of such proceeds. The Tribunal rejected the challenge based solely on non-inclusion in the predicate offence. It also held that the appellants failed to prove the lawful source of more than Rs. 10 crore remitted through banking channels and used for property purchases, and that contemporaneous SMS and purchase records supported the money-trail. The plea that some properties were acquired before the murder did not defeat equivalent value attachment, and the attachment was upheld.
Provisional attachment under the 2002 Act can extend to persons not named as accused in the FIR or chargesheet if the property is linked to proceeds of crime and the person is shown as a recipient or holder of such proceeds. The Tribunal rejected the challenge based solely on non-inclusion in the predicate offence. It also held that the appellants failed to prove the lawful source of more than Rs. 10 crore remitted through banking channels and used for property purchases, and that contemporaneous SMS and purchase records supported the money-trail. The plea that some properties were acquired before the murder did not defeat equivalent value attachment, and the attachment was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
