Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
The High Court permitted implementation of the sanctioned scheme of arrangement to address investor grievances and act on the enforcement authority's stand, but held that a civil forum could not incorporate or approve a covenant requiring joint applications to quash, compound, dismiss or discharge criminal proceedings. The alleged offences were serious and had to proceed to their logical conclusion before the competent criminal court. Lifting of attachment and disbursement to investors under the scheme were allowed, but expressly without diluting, affecting or terminating the pending criminal prosecution, which was directed to continue independently.
The High Court permitted implementation of the sanctioned scheme of arrangement to address investor grievances and act on the enforcement authority's stand, but held that a civil forum could not incorporate or approve a covenant requiring joint applications to quash, compound, dismiss or discharge criminal proceedings. The alleged offences were serious and had to proceed to their logical conclusion before the competent criminal court. Lifting of attachment and disbursement to investors under the scheme were allowed, but expressly without diluting, affecting or terminating the pending criminal prosecution, which was directed to continue independently.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
