Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
The High Court permitted implementation of the sanctioned scheme of arrangement to address investor grievances and act on the enforcement authority's stand, but held that a civil forum could not incorporate or approve a covenant requiring joint applications to quash, compound, dismiss or discharge criminal proceedings. The alleged offences were serious and had to proceed to their logical conclusion before the competent criminal court. Lifting of attachment and disbursement to investors under the scheme were allowed, but expressly without diluting, affecting or terminating the pending criminal prosecution, which was directed to continue independently.
The High Court permitted implementation of the sanctioned scheme of arrangement to address investor grievances and act on the enforcement authority's stand, but held that a civil forum could not incorporate or approve a covenant requiring joint applications to quash, compound, dismiss or discharge criminal proceedings. The alleged offences were serious and had to proceed to their logical conclusion before the competent criminal court. Lifting of attachment and disbursement to investors under the scheme were allowed, but expressly without diluting, affecting or terminating the pending criminal prosecution, which was directed to continue independently.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
