International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Misclassification between copra and dry coconut: customs recovery and re-valuation quashed for lack of prior licensing-authority invalidation, appeals...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6921 to 6940 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption under section 54 was upheld where the assessee had substantially paid the vendor and taken possession under an unregistered agreement, bringing the transaction within part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Tribunal accepted that registration was not ative on these facts and noted that the same transaction had been accepted in the vendor's assessment. It also found no defect in title material already on record and rejected the Revenue's Rule 46A objection because the conveyance deed had been before the Assessing Officer. The appellate order granting exemption was sustained and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Exemption under section 54 was upheld where the assessee had substantially paid the vendor and taken possession under an unregistered agreement, bringing the transaction within part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Tribunal accepted that registration was not ative on these facts and noted that the same transaction had been accepted in the vendor's assessment. It also found no defect in title material already on record and rejected the Revenue's Rule 46A objection because the conveyance deed had been before the Assessing Officer. The appellate order granting exemption was sustained and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.