Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Declared transaction value for imported goods must be accepted under the Customs Act and Customs Valuation Rules unless the department first records valid reasons to doubt its truth or accuracy and then applies the valuation rules sequentially. Here, the invoice and banking documents supported the declared price, there was no buyer-seller relationship or evidence of extra consideration, and the department relied on a single later higher-priced comparable despite most comparables being lower. The enhancement was therefore without legal basis and was set aside. Because the differential duty and interest had been paid under protest on an unlawful enhancement, the Tribunal ordered refund with interest from the date of payment until refund.
Declared transaction value for imported goods must be accepted under the Customs Act and Customs Valuation Rules unless the department first records valid reasons to doubt its truth or accuracy and then applies the valuation rules sequentially. Here, the invoice and banking documents supported the declared price, there was no buyer-seller relationship or evidence of extra consideration, and the department relied on a single later higher-priced comparable despite most comparables being lower. The enhancement was therefore without legal basis and was set aside. Because the differential duty and interest had been paid under protest on an unlawful enhancement, the Tribunal ordered refund with interest from the date of payment until refund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.