Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Declared transaction value for imported goods must be accepted under the Customs Act and Customs Valuation Rules unless the department first records valid reasons to doubt its truth or accuracy and then applies the valuation rules sequentially. Here, the invoice and banking documents supported the declared price, there was no buyer-seller relationship or evidence of extra consideration, and the department relied on a single later higher-priced comparable despite most comparables being lower. The enhancement was therefore without legal basis and was set aside. Because the differential duty and interest had been paid under protest on an unlawful enhancement, the Tribunal ordered refund with interest from the date of payment until refund.
Declared transaction value for imported goods must be accepted under the Customs Act and Customs Valuation Rules unless the department first records valid reasons to doubt its truth or accuracy and then applies the valuation rules sequentially. Here, the invoice and banking documents supported the declared price, there was no buyer-seller relationship or evidence of extra consideration, and the department relied on a single later higher-priced comparable despite most comparables being lower. The enhancement was therefore without legal basis and was set aside. Because the differential duty and interest had been paid under protest on an unlawful enhancement, the Tribunal ordered refund with interest from the date of payment until refund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.