Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Declared transaction value for imported goods must be accepted under the Customs Act and Customs Valuation Rules unless the department first records valid reasons to doubt its truth or accuracy and then applies the valuation rules sequentially. Here, the invoice and banking documents supported the declared price, there was no buyer-seller relationship or evidence of extra consideration, and the department relied on a single later higher-priced comparable despite most comparables being lower. The enhancement was therefore without legal basis and was set aside. Because the differential duty and interest had been paid under protest on an unlawful enhancement, the Tribunal ordered refund with interest from the date of payment until refund.
Declared transaction value for imported goods must be accepted under the Customs Act and Customs Valuation Rules unless the department first records valid reasons to doubt its truth or accuracy and then applies the valuation rules sequentially. Here, the invoice and banking documents supported the declared price, there was no buyer-seller relationship or evidence of extra consideration, and the department relied on a single later higher-priced comparable despite most comparables being lower. The enhancement was therefore without legal basis and was set aside. Because the differential duty and interest had been paid under protest on an unlawful enhancement, the Tribunal ordered refund with interest from the date of payment until refund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.