Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Transferable duty credit scrips validity and bona fide transferee entitlement to exemption upheld where scrips were subsisting at import, appeals allo...
Classification of knocked down motor vehicle component imports: Notification benefit denied because items are standalone non kit parts requiring subst...
Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representati...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6461 to 6480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A post-disposal miscellaneous application cannot be used to recall a final non-speaking order dismissing an SLP once the Court has become functus officio; only narrow exceptions such as clerical correction or inability to implement executory directions may justify such relief, so the recall application was dismissed as not maintainable. Alleged suppression, fraud, and later insolvency developments could not be raised collaterally to unsettle final disposal in a different proceeding, though separate remedies before the competent forum remained open. In matters involving withdrawal under Section 12A of the IBC, the choice between settlement options falls within the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom, subject only to limited judicial review, so the Court declined to compare competing offers or interfere with that decision.
A post-disposal miscellaneous application cannot be used to recall a final non-speaking order dismissing an SLP once the Court has become functus officio; only narrow exceptions such as clerical correction or inability to implement executory directions may justify such relief, so the recall application was dismissed as not maintainable. Alleged suppression, fraud, and later insolvency developments could not be raised collaterally to unsettle final disposal in a different proceeding, though separate remedies before the competent forum remained open. In matters involving withdrawal under Section 12A of the IBC, the choice between settlement options falls within the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom, subject only to limited judicial review, so the Court declined to compare competing offers or interfere with that decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
