Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6261 to 6280 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A post-disposal miscellaneous application cannot be used to recall a final non-speaking order dismissing an SLP once the Court has become functus officio; only narrow exceptions such as clerical correction or inability to implement executory directions may justify such relief, so the recall application was dismissed as not maintainable. Alleged suppression, fraud, and later insolvency developments could not be raised collaterally to unsettle final disposal in a different proceeding, though separate remedies before the competent forum remained open. In matters involving withdrawal under Section 12A of the IBC, the choice between settlement options falls within the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom, subject only to limited judicial review, so the Court declined to compare competing offers or interfere with that decision.
A post-disposal miscellaneous application cannot be used to recall a final non-speaking order dismissing an SLP once the Court has become functus officio; only narrow exceptions such as clerical correction or inability to implement executory directions may justify such relief, so the recall application was dismissed as not maintainable. Alleged suppression, fraud, and later insolvency developments could not be raised collaterally to unsettle final disposal in a different proceeding, though separate remedies before the competent forum remained open. In matters involving withdrawal under Section 12A of the IBC, the choice between settlement options falls within the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom, subject only to limited judicial review, so the Court declined to compare competing offers or interfere with that decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
