Deductibility for charitable donations affirmed where payments to approved relief funds, even if CSR-driven, qualify under the donation deduction sche...
Mis-declaration in import descriptions must be deliberate to justify confiscation; withheld contemporaneous import documents invalidate value redeterm...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer con...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5321 to 5340 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A post-disposal miscellaneous application cannot be used to recall a final non-speaking order dismissing an SLP once the Court has become functus officio; only narrow exceptions such as clerical correction or inability to implement executory directions may justify such relief, so the recall application was dismissed as not maintainable. Alleged suppression, fraud, and later insolvency developments could not be raised collaterally to unsettle final disposal in a different proceeding, though separate remedies before the competent forum remained open. In matters involving withdrawal under Section 12A of the IBC, the choice between settlement options falls within the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom, subject only to limited judicial review, so the Court declined to compare competing offers or interfere with that decision.
A post-disposal miscellaneous application cannot be used to recall a final non-speaking order dismissing an SLP once the Court has become functus officio; only narrow exceptions such as clerical correction or inability to implement executory directions may justify such relief, so the recall application was dismissed as not maintainable. Alleged suppression, fraud, and later insolvency developments could not be raised collaterally to unsettle final disposal in a different proceeding, though separate remedies before the competent forum remained open. In matters involving withdrawal under Section 12A of the IBC, the choice between settlement options falls within the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom, subject only to limited judicial review, so the Court declined to compare competing offers or interfere with that decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
