Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT held that a shareholder had no locus to reopen concluded insolvency proceedings or to agitate the corporate debtor's grievance after approval and implementation of the resolution plan. It found that repeated challenges based on the same memorandum of understanding and alleged fraud had already been rejected through prior proceedings, including appellate and Supreme Court scrutiny, and that the later application was a belated, suppressed and de novo attempt to relitigate settled issues. The Tribunal also held that NCLT's inherent powers could not be used to compel criminal action in a civil insolvency forum. The appeal was dismissed with costs for abuse of process.
NCLAT held that a shareholder had no locus to reopen concluded insolvency proceedings or to agitate the corporate debtor's grievance after approval and implementation of the resolution plan. It found that repeated challenges based on the same memorandum of understanding and alleged fraud had already been rejected through prior proceedings, including appellate and Supreme Court scrutiny, and that the later application was a belated, suppressed and de novo attempt to relitigate settled issues. The Tribunal also held that NCLT's inherent powers could not be used to compel criminal action in a civil insolvency forum. The appeal was dismissed with costs for abuse of process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
