Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Acknowledgment of debt in the corporate debtor's auditor's report and balance sheet extended limitation for insolvency proceedings against the personal guarantors, and an acknowledgment by the principal borrower was treated as effective for the guarantors. On that basis, a fresh limitation period began from 31.12.2020, with the COVID-19 exclusion applied, so the Section 95 petitions filed on 13.10.2023 were within time. The Tribunal also held that SARFAESI, arbitration and DRT proceedings do not bar concurrent insolvency action against personal guarantors, because remedies under SARFAESI and the IBC are independent and the Code has overriding effect. The dismissal on limitation was reversed and both petitions were allowed.
Acknowledgment of debt in the corporate debtor's auditor's report and balance sheet extended limitation for insolvency proceedings against the personal guarantors, and an acknowledgment by the principal borrower was treated as effective for the guarantors. On that basis, a fresh limitation period began from 31.12.2020, with the COVID-19 exclusion applied, so the Section 95 petitions filed on 13.10.2023 were within time. The Tribunal also held that SARFAESI, arbitration and DRT proceedings do not bar concurrent insolvency action against personal guarantors, because remedies under SARFAESI and the IBC are independent and the Code has overriding effect. The dismissal on limitation was reversed and both petitions were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.