Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Provisional attachment under the PMLA requires recorded reasons to believe, based on material, that the property involved is likely to be concealed, transferred or otherwise dealt with so as to frustrate proceedings. The Tribunal held that the mortgaged properties could not be attached on the material before it, because they were already under the banks' possession or auction process, and there was no allegation or evidence of collusion by the banks. A later claim that the properties themselves were proceeds of crime was rejected as unsupported by the record. The confirmation of attachment was therefore set aside insofar as it concerned the appellant banks.
Provisional attachment under the PMLA requires recorded reasons to believe, based on material, that the property involved is likely to be concealed, transferred or otherwise dealt with so as to frustrate proceedings. The Tribunal held that the mortgaged properties could not be attached on the material before it, because they were already under the banks' possession or auction process, and there was no allegation or evidence of collusion by the banks. A later claim that the properties themselves were proceeds of crime was rejected as unsupported by the record. The confirmation of attachment was therefore set aside insofar as it concerned the appellant banks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.