Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
The HC directed provisional release of goods and conveyance during pending revisional proceedings after noting that the first appellate authority had already modified the confiscation order and imposed liability under Section 129(1)(a), which the petitioner had satisfied. Because the revision had not yet resulted in a final order reviving action under Section 130, release was allowed but subject to revenue protection. The petitioner was required to furnish an indemnity bond and remain bound by the undertaking already filed, while the revenue retained liberty to enforce the revisional outcome. The merits of the revision were left open for the revisional authority.
The HC directed provisional release of goods and conveyance during pending revisional proceedings after noting that the first appellate authority had already modified the confiscation order and imposed liability under Section 129(1)(a), which the petitioner had satisfied. Because the revision had not yet resulted in a final order reviving action under Section 130, release was allowed but subject to revenue protection. The petitioner was required to furnish an indemnity bond and remain bound by the undertaking already filed, while the revenue retained liberty to enforce the revisional outcome. The merits of the revision were left open for the revisional authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
