Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
In a real estate anti-profiteering matter, the Tribunal applied a project-wise, area-based method to quantify the benefit of GST input tax credit and upheld the DGAP's computation on the basis that post-GST credit savings had to be passed on to homebuyers. It rejected attempts to restrict the benefit to goods-related credit or to notionally adjust unavailed pre-GST service credit, and treated the respondent's verified statements as admissions that profiteering had occurred. The amount of profiteering was upheld with GST on the excess realisation, and interest was also directed from the date of payment of the last instalment by each buyer.
In a real estate anti-profiteering matter, the Tribunal applied a project-wise, area-based method to quantify the benefit of GST input tax credit and upheld the DGAP's computation on the basis that post-GST credit savings had to be passed on to homebuyers. It rejected attempts to restrict the benefit to goods-related credit or to notionally adjust unavailed pre-GST service credit, and treated the respondent's verified statements as admissions that profiteering had occurred. The amount of profiteering was upheld with GST on the excess realisation, and interest was also directed from the date of payment of the last instalment by each buyer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
