Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Retrenchment compensation received by BSNL employees under the 2019 forced retirement scheme was treated as a capital receipt exempt from tax under section 10(10B), not as a limited exemption under section 10(10C), because the payment arose from a retrenchment-style separation scheme linked to the BSNL/MTNL revival plan. The Tribunal also accepted that the assessees could raise the exemption claim in appeal. The contrary view of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the assessees were directed to file revised income computations before the jurisdictional Assessing Officers for verification and consequential refund relief, if any.
Retrenchment compensation received by BSNL employees under the 2019 forced retirement scheme was treated as a capital receipt exempt from tax under section 10(10B), not as a limited exemption under section 10(10C), because the payment arose from a retrenchment-style separation scheme linked to the BSNL/MTNL revival plan. The Tribunal also accepted that the assessees could raise the exemption claim in appeal. The contrary view of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the assessees were directed to file revised income computations before the jurisdictional Assessing Officers for verification and consequential refund relief, if any.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
