Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Ceramic goods described as Expanded Space Fire Clay Grog were held classifiable under CTH 6902 9010 because the manufacturer's literature, industry correspondence and Chemical Examiner's reports showed the product was shaped first and fired or sintered thereafter, satisfying the Chapter 69 requirement for products fired after shaping. The Tribunal rejected Revenue's reliance on a lone supplier invoice and held the Commissioner was not justified in disregarding the departmental test reports. It also held the extended period of limitation was unavailable because the Bills of Entry expressly disclosed the goods as refractory products under CTH 6902 9010, so suppression or misrepresentation with intent to evade duty was not established. Consequential relief followed.
Ceramic goods described as Expanded Space Fire Clay Grog were held classifiable under CTH 6902 9010 because the manufacturer's literature, industry correspondence and Chemical Examiner's reports showed the product was shaped first and fired or sintered thereafter, satisfying the Chapter 69 requirement for products fired after shaping. The Tribunal rejected Revenue's reliance on a lone supplier invoice and held the Commissioner was not justified in disregarding the departmental test reports. It also held the extended period of limitation was unavailable because the Bills of Entry expressly disclosed the goods as refractory products under CTH 6902 9010, so suppression or misrepresentation with intent to evade duty was not established. Consequential relief followed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
