Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Ceramic goods described as Expanded Space Fire Clay Grog were held classifiable under CTH 6902 9010 because the manufacturer's literature, industry correspondence and Chemical Examiner's reports showed the product was shaped first and fired or sintered thereafter, satisfying the Chapter 69 requirement for products fired after shaping. The Tribunal rejected Revenue's reliance on a lone supplier invoice and held the Commissioner was not justified in disregarding the departmental test reports. It also held the extended period of limitation was unavailable because the Bills of Entry expressly disclosed the goods as refractory products under CTH 6902 9010, so suppression or misrepresentation with intent to evade duty was not established. Consequential relief followed.
Ceramic goods described as Expanded Space Fire Clay Grog were held classifiable under CTH 6902 9010 because the manufacturer's literature, industry correspondence and Chemical Examiner's reports showed the product was shaped first and fired or sintered thereafter, satisfying the Chapter 69 requirement for products fired after shaping. The Tribunal rejected Revenue's reliance on a lone supplier invoice and held the Commissioner was not justified in disregarding the departmental test reports. It also held the extended period of limitation was unavailable because the Bills of Entry expressly disclosed the goods as refractory products under CTH 6902 9010, so suppression or misrepresentation with intent to evade duty was not established. Consequential relief followed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
