Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Functional comparability in transfer pricing failed for MPS Ltd.; exclusion from comparables removed the adjustment.
    Under-reporting penalty under section 270A deleted after quantum addition failed and returned income was accepted.
    Section 54F relief upheld for investment before section 139(4), single contiguous house ownership, and asset-wise capital gains treatment.
    Composite property and stamp valuation disputes: residential portion qualifies for section 54, and DVO reference is required.
    Unabated assessments need year-specific incriminating material; loose notings and mere presumption cannot sustain property-sale additions.
    Compensatory interest and business advances upheld as allowable; cash payment and unexplained credit additions were rejected.
    ITBA upload of DRP directions starts limitation for final assessment; delayed orders are time-barred and quashed.
    Transfer pricing comparability adjustments turned on foreign exchange, customs duty, liability write-back and cash PLI methodology.
    Transfer pricing characterization and FAR analysis required fresh review before selecting the most appropriate method.
    Transfer pricing on interest-free group loans fails where business has not commenced and no income was earned.
    Export incentives count as operating revenue; working capital adjustment and section 80G relief for CSR donation allowed.
    Aggregated TNMM accepted for linked transactions, with nil ALP and separate receivables adjustment both rejected.
    RoDTEP eligibility for restricted sugar exports cannot be denied where exports were made under permitted quota and approval.
    Reasoned order required on refund interest claim; omission to address accrued interest showed non-application of mind.
    Binding precedent and seat-part classification control: seat-mechanism components remained parts of seats, not motor-vehicle accessories.
    Untested customs statements cannot sustain rejection of transaction value without mandatory section 138B compliance.
    Electronic evidence, customs valuation and undervaluation findings upheld; separate penalties for document suppression were set aside.
    DFIA exemption for non-sensitive inputs applies without technical correlation, but only on strict conformity with licence conditions.
    Admitted homebuyer claims cannot be reopened after plan approval; resolution applicants must honour crystallised liabilities and hand over possession.
    Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Ceramic goods described as Expanded Space Fire Clay Grog were...

Ceramic classification under CTH 6902 9010 upheld; Chemical Examiner's reports accepted and extended limitation rejected for no suppression.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs March 26, 2026 Case Laws AT
Ceramic goods described as Expanded Space Fire Clay Grog were held classifiable under CTH 6902 9010 because the manufacturer's literature, industry correspondence and Chemical Examiner's reports showed the product was shaped first and fired or sintered thereafter, satisfying the Chapter 69 requirement for products fired after shaping. The Tribunal rejected Revenue's reliance on a lone supplier invoice and held the Commissioner was not justified in disregarding the departmental test reports. It also held the extended period of limitation was unavailable because the Bills of Entry expressly disclosed the goods as refractory products under CTH 6902 9010, so suppression or misrepresentation with intent to evade duty was not established. Consequential relief followed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax