Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
The Appellate Tribunal held that the Committee of Creditors could reject the resolution plans and annul the insolvency process because the RFRP, read with the CIRP framework, reserved a general right to accept, reject or terminate the bid process at any stage without reasons. Although the bid framework contemplated negotiations and a challenge mechanism, it did not impose a mandatory bar on stopping the process before that stage. The record also showed the applicant participated, revised its plan, and was not denied an opportunity. As the plans were found financially non-viable and below liquidation value, the decision fell within the CoC's commercial wisdom and warranted no appellate interference.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the Committee of Creditors could reject the resolution plans and annul the insolvency process because the RFRP, read with the CIRP framework, reserved a general right to accept, reject or terminate the bid process at any stage without reasons. Although the bid framework contemplated negotiations and a challenge mechanism, it did not impose a mandatory bar on stopping the process before that stage. The record also showed the applicant participated, revised its plan, and was not denied an opportunity. As the plans were found financially non-viable and below liquidation value, the decision fell within the CoC's commercial wisdom and warranted no appellate interference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
