Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tax recovery and attachment cannot continue beyond the subsisting recoverable demand after appellate relief. The Court found that most demands underlying the tax recovery certificates had ceased to survive, and only the interest component relating to the quantum addition for A.Y. 2008-09 remained presently recoverable, while the penalty demand and interest thereon were stayed. The recovery certificates and attachments were therefore unsustainable except to the limited extent needed to protect the Revenue for the unstayed demand. Attachments over two properties were quashed, one property was allowed to remain attached, and the certificates were directed to be revised to reflect only the outstanding unstayed demand.
Tax recovery and attachment cannot continue beyond the subsisting recoverable demand after appellate relief. The Court found that most demands underlying the tax recovery certificates had ceased to survive, and only the interest component relating to the quantum addition for A.Y. 2008-09 remained presently recoverable, while the penalty demand and interest thereon were stayed. The recovery certificates and attachments were therefore unsustainable except to the limited extent needed to protect the Revenue for the unstayed demand. Attachments over two properties were quashed, one property was allowed to remain attached, and the certificates were directed to be revised to reflect only the outstanding unstayed demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
