Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for dir...
Classification of imported goods as electronic cigarette versus tobacco product reversed for lack of proof; order set aside for jurisdictional overrea...
Tax recovery and attachment cannot continue beyond the subsisting recoverable demand after appellate relief. The Court found that most demands underlying the tax recovery certificates had ceased to survive, and only the interest component relating to the quantum addition for A.Y. 2008-09 remained presently recoverable, while the penalty demand and interest thereon were stayed. The recovery certificates and attachments were therefore unsustainable except to the limited extent needed to protect the Revenue for the unstayed demand. Attachments over two properties were quashed, one property was allowed to remain attached, and the certificates were directed to be revised to reflect only the outstanding unstayed demand.
Tax recovery and attachment cannot continue beyond the subsisting recoverable demand after appellate relief. The Court found that most demands underlying the tax recovery certificates had ceased to survive, and only the interest component relating to the quantum addition for A.Y. 2008-09 remained presently recoverable, while the penalty demand and interest thereon were stayed. The recovery certificates and attachments were therefore unsustainable except to the limited extent needed to protect the Revenue for the unstayed demand. Attachments over two properties were quashed, one property was allowed to remain attached, and the certificates were directed to be revised to reflect only the outstanding unstayed demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
