Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Eligibility under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 turns on whether a qualifying appeal or proceeding was pending on the specified date of 22.07.2024. The Court read the scheme and removal of difficulties order to cover only cases where the order appealed from existed before that date, the appeal period was still open on that date, and the appeal was filed within time without any condonation request. Because the Tribunal had already decided the matter, no appeal under section 260A was pending, limitation had expired before the specified date, and the later rectification application was also time-barred, the assessee was held ineligible for the scheme.
Eligibility under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 turns on whether a qualifying appeal or proceeding was pending on the specified date of 22.07.2024. The Court read the scheme and removal of difficulties order to cover only cases where the order appealed from existed before that date, the appeal period was still open on that date, and the appeal was filed within time without any condonation request. Because the Tribunal had already decided the matter, no appeal under section 260A was pending, limitation had expired before the specified date, and the later rectification application was also time-barred, the assessee was held ineligible for the scheme.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.