Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
A common satisfaction note recorded under section 153C for multiple assessment years was held to be legally unsustainable. The Tribunal, following co-ordinate bench authority, accepted that satisfaction must be recorded separately for each assessment year because a consolidated note defeats valid assumption of jurisdiction. On that basis, the assessments for the relevant years were quashed.
A common satisfaction note recorded under section 153C for multiple assessment years was held to be legally unsustainable. The Tribunal, following co-ordinate bench authority, accepted that satisfaction must be recorded separately for each assessment year because a consolidated note defeats valid assumption of jurisdiction. On that basis, the assessments for the relevant years were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.