Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative society to claim deduction for interest derived from investments with another co-operative society, and section 80P(4) bars only a co-operative bank from claiming deduction in its own right. The ITAT applied this distinction to interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks, following Sikkim State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation and distinguishing Totgars as a case under section 80P(2)(a)(i). It also relied on Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills to hold that the source of invested funds was not decisive where the income arose from investment with a co-operative society. The disallowance was held unsustainable and the deduction was allowed.
Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative society to claim deduction for interest derived from investments with another co-operative society, and section 80P(4) bars only a co-operative bank from claiming deduction in its own right. The ITAT applied this distinction to interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks, following Sikkim State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation and distinguishing Totgars as a case under section 80P(2)(a)(i). It also relied on Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills to hold that the source of invested funds was not decisive where the income arose from investment with a co-operative society. The disallowance was held unsustainable and the deduction was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.