Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative society to claim deduction for interest derived from investments with another co-operative society, and section 80P(4) bars only a co-operative bank from claiming deduction in its own right. The ITAT applied this distinction to interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks, following Sikkim State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation and distinguishing Totgars as a case under section 80P(2)(a)(i). It also relied on Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills to hold that the source of invested funds was not decisive where the income arose from investment with a co-operative society. The disallowance was held unsustainable and the deduction was allowed.
Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative society to claim deduction for interest derived from investments with another co-operative society, and section 80P(4) bars only a co-operative bank from claiming deduction in its own right. The ITAT applied this distinction to interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks, following Sikkim State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation and distinguishing Totgars as a case under section 80P(2)(a)(i). It also relied on Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills to hold that the source of invested funds was not decisive where the income arose from investment with a co-operative society. The disallowance was held unsustainable and the deduction was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
