Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative society to claim deduction for interest derived from investments with another co-operative society, and section 80P(4) bars only a co-operative bank from claiming deduction in its own right. The ITAT applied this distinction to interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks, following Sikkim State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation and distinguishing Totgars as a case under section 80P(2)(a)(i). It also relied on Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills to hold that the source of invested funds was not decisive where the income arose from investment with a co-operative society. The disallowance was held unsustainable and the deduction was allowed.
Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative society to claim deduction for interest derived from investments with another co-operative society, and section 80P(4) bars only a co-operative bank from claiming deduction in its own right. The ITAT applied this distinction to interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks, following Sikkim State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation and distinguishing Totgars as a case under section 80P(2)(a)(i). It also relied on Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills to hold that the source of invested funds was not decisive where the income arose from investment with a co-operative society. The disallowance was held unsustainable and the deduction was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.