Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Transferable duty credit scrips validity and bona fide transferee entitlement to exemption upheld where scrips were subsisting at import, appeals allo...
Classification of knocked down motor vehicle component imports: Notification benefit denied because items are standalone non kit parts requiring subst...
Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representati...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6461 to 6480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative society to claim deduction for interest derived from investments with another co-operative society, and section 80P(4) bars only a co-operative bank from claiming deduction in its own right. The ITAT applied this distinction to interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks, following Sikkim State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation and distinguishing Totgars as a case under section 80P(2)(a)(i). It also relied on Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills to hold that the source of invested funds was not decisive where the income arose from investment with a co-operative society. The disallowance was held unsustainable and the deduction was allowed.
Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative society to claim deduction for interest derived from investments with another co-operative society, and section 80P(4) bars only a co-operative bank from claiming deduction in its own right. The ITAT applied this distinction to interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks, following Sikkim State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation and distinguishing Totgars as a case under section 80P(2)(a)(i). It also relied on Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills to hold that the source of invested funds was not decisive where the income arose from investment with a co-operative society. The disallowance was held unsustainable and the deduction was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.