NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative society to claim deduction for interest derived from investments with another co-operative society, and section 80P(4) bars only a co-operative bank from claiming deduction in its own right. The ITAT applied this distinction to interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks, following Sikkim State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation and distinguishing Totgars as a case under section 80P(2)(a)(i). It also relied on Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills to hold that the source of invested funds was not decisive where the income arose from investment with a co-operative society. The disallowance was held unsustainable and the deduction was allowed.
Section 80P(2)(d) permits a co-operative society to claim deduction for interest derived from investments with another co-operative society, and section 80P(4) bars only a co-operative bank from claiming deduction in its own right. The ITAT applied this distinction to interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks, following Sikkim State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation and distinguishing Totgars as a case under section 80P(2)(a)(i). It also relied on Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills to hold that the source of invested funds was not decisive where the income arose from investment with a co-operative society. The disallowance was held unsustainable and the deduction was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.