Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Disallowance of remuneration to directors and relatives under section 40A(2)(b) was deleted because the Assessing Officer did not benchmark the payment against fair market value and relied instead on an earlier-year comparison and an arbitrary 10% increase, despite accepted past scrutiny assessments and undisputed services. The Tribunal also upheld allowance of foreign travel expenditure, finding no Rule 46A breach where the travel details had already been filed and no evidence showed absence of business purpose. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Disallowance of remuneration to directors and relatives under section 40A(2)(b) was deleted because the Assessing Officer did not benchmark the payment against fair market value and relied instead on an earlier-year comparison and an arbitrary 10% increase, despite accepted past scrutiny assessments and undisputed services. The Tribunal also upheld allowance of foreign travel expenditure, finding no Rule 46A breach where the travel details had already been filed and no evidence showed absence of business purpose. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
