Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6121 to 6140 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips were treated as void ab...
Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell away.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips were treated as void ab initio, so the customs exemption based on them was never available. The tribunal found that the exporter had misdeclared IT and IT-enabled services as management consulting services to obtain the scrips, and that their later utilisation for duty payment satisfied Section 28AAA, justifying recovery of duty with interest. It also rejected the challenge to use of the Section 108 statement, finding no prejudice from the absence of further examination and no retraction of the statement. On the same facts, confiscation and penalties for fraudulent exemption claims were sustained, but the personal penalty on the employee-CFO was set aside.
Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips were treated as void ab initio, so the customs exemption based on them was never available. The tribunal found that the exporter had misdeclared IT and IT-enabled services as management consulting services to obtain the scrips, and that their later utilisation for duty payment satisfied Section 28AAA, justifying recovery of duty with interest. It also rejected the challenge to use of the Section 108 statement, finding no prejudice from the absence of further examination and no retraction of the statement. On the same facts, confiscation and penalties for fraudulent exemption claims were sustained, but the personal penalty on the employee-CFO was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.