Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Additional input tax credit benefit under anti-profiteering rules had to be passed on to homebuyers at the time of supply, and the Tribunal accepted the DGAP's revised computation showing that the benefit was not fully transferred. It directed refund of the unpassed amount with interest at 18% per annum from the respective dates of collection until actual repayment, treating retention of the benefit as excess consideration. It also held that penalty under Section 171(3A) applies to contraventions within its operative period, since the alleged profiteering overlapped the commencement date of that provision.
Additional input tax credit benefit under anti-profiteering rules had to be passed on to homebuyers at the time of supply, and the Tribunal accepted the DGAP's revised computation showing that the benefit was not fully transferred. It directed refund of the unpassed amount with interest at 18% per annum from the respective dates of collection until actual repayment, treating retention of the benefit as excess consideration. It also held that penalty under Section 171(3A) applies to contraventions within its operative period, since the alleged profiteering overlapped the commencement date of that provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
