Deductibility for charitable donations affirmed where payments to approved relief funds, even if CSR-driven, qualify under the donation deduction sche...
Mis-declaration in import descriptions must be deliberate to justify confiscation; withheld contemporaneous import documents invalidate value redeterm...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer con...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5321 to 5340 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Waste dump remediation and legacy waste processing services, involving excavation, segregation, scientific disposal and conversion into RDF, compost, grit and inert fractions, were classified under SAC 9994 for sewage, waste collection, treatment, disposal and other environmental protection services, and held taxable at 18%. The supply to Goa Waste Management Corporation was nevertheless treated as pure services, because no goods were involved and the activity related to solid waste management and bio-remediation, a municipal function under Article 243W; exemption under Sl. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT was therefore available. A separate query on the recipient's status was declined as outside the scope of advance ruling jurisdiction under Section 97(2).
Waste dump remediation and legacy waste processing services, involving excavation, segregation, scientific disposal and conversion into RDF, compost, grit and inert fractions, were classified under SAC 9994 for sewage, waste collection, treatment, disposal and other environmental protection services, and held taxable at 18%. The supply to Goa Waste Management Corporation was nevertheless treated as pure services, because no goods were involved and the activity related to solid waste management and bio-remediation, a municipal function under Article 243W; exemption under Sl. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT was therefore available. A separate query on the recipient's status was declined as outside the scope of advance ruling jurisdiction under Section 97(2).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.