NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Bio-mining of legacy waste, including excavation, screening, shredding, segregation, treatment and scientific disposal with dump-yard reclamation, was classified under SAC 9994 as waste treatment, disposal and site remediation services and stated to attract GST at 18%. The Authority nevertheless held the supply to Ariyalur Municipality exempt under Sl. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax because it was a pure service, involved no supply of goods, and related to municipal functions such as public health, sanitation and solid waste management entrusted under Article 243W. The separate query on the recipient's status was held outside advance ruling jurisdiction, so no ruling was given on that question.
Bio-mining of legacy waste, including excavation, screening, shredding, segregation, treatment and scientific disposal with dump-yard reclamation, was classified under SAC 9994 as waste treatment, disposal and site remediation services and stated to attract GST at 18%. The Authority nevertheless held the supply to Ariyalur Municipality exempt under Sl. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax because it was a pure service, involved no supply of goods, and related to municipal functions such as public health, sanitation and solid waste management entrusted under Article 243W. The separate query on the recipient's status was held outside advance ruling jurisdiction, so no ruling was given on that question.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.